Press "Enter" to skip to content

Good Controller/Bad Controller – CFO

Back again in 2012, Ben Horowitz published an short article titled “Superior Item Manager/ Negative Item Manager.” We borrowed from his format as we assessed a critical part in a quick-expanding company’s finance organization: the controller. (See our former column, Superior CFO/Negative CFO.) Distinctive many thanks to Aman KothariDarko Socanski, and the Bessemer Undertaking Companions CFO Advisory Board for their contributions.

Acquiring the ideal company controller for the scale and phase of development for your organization is vital. If your firm is a modest, quick-expanding organization, a “big company” controller may be unable or unwilling to roll up their sleeves to lean in and assistance deal with your most crucial troubles. If your organization is additional mature, an exceptional, arms-on modest firm controller may have trouble acquiring a potent staff and wondering and performing strategically.

The “goldilocks” controller has the ideal blend of abilities and interests for your latest problems with the potential to scale the firm in the shorter-to-medium term. As an organization scales it is not unusual for the controller to both be upgraded or for a chief accounting officer to be hired about them to assistance bridge gaps.

Adam C. Spiegel

Whether or not you will need a additional nimble, arms-on controller or a huge-picture, strategic controller, right here are some widespread traits to contemplate in the assortment and evaluation method.

A very good controller can establish and direct a potent accounting staff. He or she hires the ideal persons for the part and for the staff and firm lifestyle. A poor controller is challenged on this front — he or she mis-hires and winds up doing all of the function by themselves, then complains about it to everybody who will hear.

A very good controller organizes for accomplishment. He or she designs their organization in a way that optimally supports the small business now and that can be flexible to meet up with transforming shorter-to-medium term requirements. A poor controller hires bodies to “get the work done” and doesn’t have time to imagine about what will come subsequent.

A very good controller takes advantage of their innate being familiar with of each individual staff member’s aspirations and restrictions to get the greatest out of them. A poor controller just can’t tell the variation amongst very good expertise and poor expertise. He or she is worried to enhance the staff for the reason that of the more function they’ll will need to do for the duration of the transition period.

A very good controller sets crystal clear expectations with the staff and follows up. He or she sets targets for by themselves and their staff focused on continuous method advancement. He or she asks a lot of open up-ended inquiries and learns from the responses. A poor controller does issues the way the past controller did them with no at any time asking why. Negative controllers have no will need to request inquiries as they presently know all of the responses.

At a more compact firm, a very good controller enjoys getting arms-on and is delighted with that as an ongoing element of their work, comfortably performing both of those as a preparer and a reviewer. A poor controller in this dimensions firm resents getting to do the element function by themselves and doesn’t hassle to review the function of subordinates.

Jeff Epstein

A very good controller “owns it.” He or she is ready to do no matter what it can take to get the work carried out and will function shoulder to shoulder with the staff for the duration of all those extended near or pre-audit nights. The poor controller punches out immediately after their 8 hrs no matter of what is likely on in the office, leaving the staff powering to fend for by themselves.

A very good controller is brief to distribute the credit and gradual to distribute the blame. He or she can take pleasure in the team’s successes and owns their failures. The similar miscalculation doesn’t occur yet again for the reason that it will become a instructing minute and a lesson is learned. A poor controller can take credit for others’ successes and blames some others when issues go wrong. There is no instructing and the similar issues occur about and about yet again.

A very good controller is super support-oriented and assures that the finance staff provides exceptional support to its clients (the relaxation of the business). A poor controller doesn’t think that finance has any clients and ignores the requirements of the other departments.

A very good controller communicates well, both of those within just finance and to the broader organization, figuring out that he or she is element of a collective staff that only succeeds collectively. A poor controller operates in a silo and doesn’t really encourage collaboration.

A very good controller understands procedures, techniques, and their fundamental information and will function closely with engineering and IT companions to get the greatest out of their technology applications. A poor controller doesn’t apply techniques initiatives for the reason that he or she just can’t come across the time. Negative controllers hold up the migration from QuickBooks for the reason that they like the overall flexibility to be capable to go back again to edit closed durations.

A very good controller produces precise fiscal statements on a predictable schedule and has a strategy to increase upon their timeliness and comprehensiveness. He or she understands that having to a quicker every month near suggests that the staff will have additional time each individual month for method advancement, building the subsequent every month near even superior. In a bigger personal firm, the very good controller has a strategy to cut down every month near to a general public firm timeframe even though also keeping the sanity of the staff. The poor controller takes advantage of the complete month (or additional) to near the textbooks, leaving no time for method advancement and leaving the staff perpetually in a state of exhaustion and tension.

A very good controller inherently understands and is fluent in the greater part of the operational and complex accounting principles relevant to the small business. At a more compact firm, the controller might not have the similar depth of complex accounting expertise but he or she will nonetheless be fluent in the critical principles so as to know when to request more inquiries or flag troubles. The poor controller assumes that the auditors will determine out all of the complex accounting troubles in the audit so he or she minimizes their energy expended on investigating them.

A very good controller builds a potent and constructive performing connection with the audit spouse and is unafraid to engage in genuine and open up dialog close to vital inner troubles. Good controllers communicate typically and share the widespread aim of “getting issues right” and preventing surprises. The poor controller dreads each dialogue with the audit spouse out of dread that his or her incompetence will be exposed.

A very good controller is ethically and morally grounded and is unafraid to challenge and engage with some others at all concentrations of the organization in discussions about ethical troubles. A poor controller life in dread for their work and therefore will disguise from hard troubles.

A very good controller initiatives gravitas and can spouse well with executives and some others across the organization. A poor controller is not comfortable when interacting with some others and it reveals.

A very good controller seeks out mentorship and guidance and is focused on self-advancement. A poor controller just “does their job” as he or she doesn’t have the bandwidth to do any additional.

Adam Spiegel served as CFO for a collection of general public and personal higher development technology organizations which includes RPX and Glassdoor. Beforehand he used about a decade as an expense banker for the Credit score Suisse First Boston Technological innovation Group and Prudential Securities, finishing transactions valued at about $8 billion. He now mentors CFOs and advises other executives of higher development technology organizations.

Jeff Epstein is an running spouse at Bessemer Undertaking Companions and a lecturer at Stanford University. He specializes in marketplaces and small business-to-small business program organizations. He serves on the boards of administrators and audit committees of Kaiser Permanente, Twilio, Shutterstock, and several personal organizations.

Bessemer Undertaking Companions, contributor, controller, Glassdoor